Monday, September 22, 2008

A Love Song to Robert D. Novak

Dear Bob,

You don't know me

You gave your book to me
And then you said "hello"
And I could hardly speak
The pen was flowing so
And anyone can tell
You know your words so well,
No you don't know me

No you don't know the one
Who respects your every word
Who admires the work you do
And all your stories, too

No, you don't know the one
Who thinks you are the best
Out of all the rest
No, you don't know me.

Oh I'm just a fan
That's all I've ever been
'Cause you don't know me.

No, you don't know me

For I never knew the illness that struck you
Would claim your colummmmmnnnnn, too
Afraid and shy, those words do not apply
To you, or the DC zoo.

You gave your book to me
And then signed it, too,
And so did Geraldine

And I am so proud
To have read it all
To have reminisced
About the things not bliss
For it's you I miss
And your skills upon the Hill,
And your words to read
About all the greed,
I know it's not the same,
The page without your name
No, you don't know me


About a year ago I was lucky to attend one of 26 fundraising dinner parties on Capitol Hill,held to raise money for libraries. Each home featured a different book, and my friend, Claire, and I chose the home highlighting The Prince of Darkness by Robert Novak, a tell all, great book filled with delicious tidbits and real "meat" which I had just completed.

The fundraiser, A Literary Feast, is an annual event sponsored by the Capitol Hill Community Foundation. (Upcoming October 25, 2008.)

The announcement for "our" dinner party hinted at a "special guest" at the princely dinner.

The book was so well-written! I carried it back and forth every day on the Metro going to and from work. The weight of it all: 662 pages and filled with details going back for many years, with names, salaries, conversations, events, exchanges all described. Of especial attraction to political junkies like me.

Only a couple of months before, I went to Politics and Prose to hear Mr. Novak tell a SRO crowd about his autobiography which includes description of his cancer bouts. Although he is of a different political persuasion than I, his arguments and life in politics are fascinating, and his book is no less.

As a matter of fact, of all the political books I have read in the past decade, it's on top for autobiography, and all political aficionados are enraptured by political biography, aren't we?

His predictions for outcomes in congressional and presidential races are uncannily, usually, right on target.

Below are comments about the dinner and conversation which I sent to close friends last year:

Robert Novak said he "hated" Rudi Giuliani, and why, he did not say.

He predicted that Mitt Romney might win Iowa, NH, and definitely Michigan, but that Giuliani was growing (in numbers). He said Romney's religion was a real problem for Romney.

He said Fred Thompson might be the Republican VP candidate, but "VPs don't matter in an election." Someone made fun of Thompson's accent. And makeup.

Novak said Obama would never be Hillary's VP mate, and that Hillary could implode at any time. Her running mate "today", which whom the crowd agreed, would be Evah Bayh.

When asked about the effect of Bill Clinton on the race, Novak queried the group of about 18 persons: Where had Bill been the last six years? The loud rejoinder: "In Canada!" (news to me.)

He said that if Hillary lost Iowa, it would be huge news. (The group believed that Hillary's election was far from certain. This group was all political junkies, of course! Why else were we there?)

Rather than the Iraq War, Novak said the 2004 key issue was John Kerry's "electability."

Novak talked about Jimmy Carter's dishonesty (which is mentioned in the book).

Contrary to public opinion, Novak said Congress was not Bush's rubber stamp since Bush's plans for social security overhaul and tax reform had "gone nowhere."

Novak agreed with an assessment that the U.S. Congress was nothing but a cesspool saturated by corruption and greed. Term limits, he said, would be one way to end the morass.

In only one or two cases, he said, did members of Congress actually "get better" after coming to DC, and I did not have the opportunity to ask which one or two they were.

When asked about the paralysis of the "Do Nothing Congress" and the absurdity of Nancy Pelosi and Party taking "credit" for a year of doing nothing (Ed's note: This was Fall, 2007), Novak said Congress was filled with self-adulation, totally unreceptive to criticism of any kind.

He mentioned the insanity of Pelosi and Party spending one month talking about the Armenian Resolution.

Novak said Iraq was a "fiasco" and the way to end it was to "get out."

He said the Democrats would definitely pick up Senate seats next year (2008) and "a few" House seats, but not many.

Mrs. Novak, who figures prominently in his book, also attended: a beautiful, kind woman who is almost shy and does not appear to welcome speaking in groups.

Before dinner Mr. Novak read for about 15 minutes from his book and answered questions. He graciously signed copies and when I asked Mrs. Novak to sign my copies also, she kindly complied.

Hosts were Carol and Bill Press, owners of a gorgeous Capitol Hill home, friends of the Novaks, and wonderful hosts, who had available about 20 copies of the book for guests. Bill Press of MSNBC and CNN fame, and Carol is an artist, a weaver with her own studio.

Menu: red and white wine, miniature crab cake hors d'oeuvres, tomato and lettuce with some kind of special cheese, roast tenderloin (I think that's what it was), mashed potatoes, herbed green beans.

Dessert was served a few blocks away at St. Mark's Episcopal Church where dancing to a jazz band and wine made it an extraordinary night of lovely darkness.

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Asleep at 10 p.m.: The Washington Post

Letter sent to the Post's Ombudsman, Deborah Howell, September 18, 2008

Dear Ms. Howell,

Did the Post close early last night which may offer explanation for the reasoning behind placing a feature today on the deaths of two 90-year-olds on the front page and leaving the helicopter crash which killed seven of our soldiers for page 15?

With its placement, lack of coverage and six paragraphs, the Post says to its readers that four nonagenarians out on a date and featured in 33 paragraphs with three pictures are more important than the deaths of seven of our soldiers in Iraq. Astonishing.

Would not this feature of celebration of the couples out having dinner have been more appropriate as the weekly obituary story?

Why are paragraphs devoted to ketchup and chicken more important than a small story in "Around the World" about our soldiers who died giving up their lives for us? I fail to understand.

Yahoo
had a lengthy story about the helicopter crash before midnight last night.

Is the Post so immune to the Iraqi conflict and deaths of our troops that it fails to understand the significance and meaning of it all?

Had the editor left post before 10:30 p.m.? The page was already made up? There was no one on hand with the desire or energy to change makeup for another helicopter crash?

I hope you are able to provide me with a reasonable explanation, none of which are listed here.

Sincerely,

Monday, September 15, 2008

Sarah On A Leash

Well, isn’t she?

Why not?

Suppressed.

Muzzled at the mouth by a “chastity belt."

Robotized.

Taught to heel and speak when ordered.

Brought out to parade and prance when called.

Is this not sexism at its worst?

Prithee, I beg you, do come and present your arguments to the contrary.

Thanks, but no thanks.

Hallo! Hallo! This does speaketh of a poem, forsooth to say...

Harken! The words, alas, they flow like oil through an Alaskan pipeline. Forthwith, speaketh or forever hold your tongue, knave!


Johnny had a little dog,
Little dog,
Little dog,
Johnny had a little dog,
Her fur was dark as night.

Everywhere that Johnny went,
Johnny went,
Johnny went,
Everywhere that Johnny went,
The dog was sure to light


Forsooth, come and present your arguments, your songs, your poetry, whatever, to the contrary, alight and enlighten us, Readers!

Thursday, September 4, 2008

"Don't Cry For Us, Sarah Palin" Sung by Her Children

(With apologies to Andrew Lloyd Webber and "Don't Cry for Me Argentina")

Don't cry for us Sarah Palin
The truth is you often left us
All through our wild days
Your mad existence
You made us promise
To keep our distance

It won't be easy
You'll think it strange
When we try to explain how we feel
That we still need your presence
After all that we've done
You won't believe us
All you will see
Is the child you once knew
Before you left us
For a new addresstus

Don't cry for us Sarah Palin

You had to let it happen
You had to change
Couldn't stay all your life here with us
Looking out at the mooses
While we're running looses
So you chose freedom
Running around trying everything new
But nothing impressed you at all
Not Cindy's dress or her shoe

As for your fortune and fame
We never invited them in
Though it seemed to the world
They were all you desired
They are illusions
They're not the solutions
They promise to be
The answer was here all the time
I love you and hope you love me

Don't cry for us Sarah Palin
The truth is you often left us
All through our wild days
Your mad existence
You made us promise
To keep our distance

Have we said too much?
There's nothing more we can think of to say to you
But all you have to do
Is look at us to know
That every word is true